<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Becoming Creation &#187; Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://becomingcreation.org/category/books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://becomingcreation.org</link>
	<description>Exploring and promoting the scientific, theological and personal meaning of creation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 22:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Epistles by Peter and Paul</title>
		<link>http://becomingcreation.org/2009/05/epistles-by-peter-and-paul/</link>
		<comments>http://becomingcreation.org/2009/05/epistles-by-peter-and-paul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 12:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://becomingcreation.org/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="wp-caption-text">Inerrant Wisdom by Paul Seely</p>
<p>Peter Enns recently reviewed Paul Seely&#8217;s book called Inerrant Wisdom: Science and Inerrancy in Biblical Perspective. The book, published in 1989, deals with the &#8220;doctrine&#8221; of biblical inerrancy and the closely related concept of concordance between Scripture and contemporary science. I haven&#8217;t read Seely&#8217;s book, but I am familiar with his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_77" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><a><img class="size-full wp-image-77" title="paulseelyinerrantwisdom" src="http://becomingcreation.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/paulseelyinerrantwisdom.jpg" alt="Inerrant Wisdom by Paul Seely" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Inerrant Wisdom by Paul Seely</p></div>
<p><a href="http://peterennsonline.com/book-reviews/review-inerrant-wisdom-by-paul-seely/" target="_blank">Peter Enns recently reviewed Paul Seely&#8217;s book</a> called <em>Inerrant Wisdom: Science and Inerrancy in Biblical Perspective</em>. The book, published in 1989, deals with the &#8220;doctrine&#8221; of biblical inerrancy and the closely related concept of concordance between Scripture and contemporary science. I haven&#8217;t read Seely&#8217;s book, but I am familiar with his more recent contributions to <a href="http://www.asa3.org/ASA/PSCF.html" target="_blank">Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith (PSCF)</a>, the journal of the <a href="http://www.asa3.org" target="_blank">American Scientific Affiliation (ASA)</a>. You can locate several of Seely&#8217;s PSCF articles by searching the <a href="http://129.82.76.41:591/ASAdb/search.html" target="_blank">journals archives</a> for &#8220;Seely, Paul&#8221;.</p>
<p>Here is a link to one of the more recent articles dealing with concordism: <a href="http://www.asa3.org/ASA/PSCF/2007/PSCF3-07Seely.pdf" target="_blank">Seely, P. (2007). Concordism and a Biblical Alternative: An Examination of Hugh Ross’s Perspective. PSCF 59(1):37-45.</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m in general agreement with Seely&#8217;s views about the the inadequacies and deficiencies of concordism. In my next post, I&#8217;ll share some of my own thoughts and reasons for not liking the term inerrancy. Admittedly, I&#8217;m no authority on the subject; I write as a &#8220;questioning&#8221; layperson, albeit one with sufficient scientific knowledge to know the magnitude of conflicts that make concordance and strict inerrancy untenable.</p>
<div id="attachment_76" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><img class="size-full wp-image-76" title="peterennsbook_iandi" src="http://becomingcreation.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/peterennsbook_iandi.jpg" alt="Inspiration and Incarnation by Peter Enns" width="200" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Inspiration and Incarnation by Peter Enns</p></div>
<p>And, since I&#8217;ve mentioned Peter Enns, I might as well highlight his important 2005 book called <a href="http://peterennsonline.com/books-by-peter-enns-current-and-coming/" target="_blank"><em>Inspiration and Incarnation</em></a> (Amazon link <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0801027306?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=sacredjourn0a-20&amp;link_code=as3&amp;camp=211189&amp;creative=373489&amp;creativeASIN=0801027306" target="_blank">here</a>). I am eager to read it sometime soon. He proposes &#8220;an &#8216;incarnational&#8217; model of Scripture—one that recognizes and affirms both the divine and human aspects of the Bible.&#8221; I definitely agree with that concept.</p>
<p>&#8230;Actually, it occurs to me that it&#8217;s my turn next month to pick a book for my men&#8217;s group book club at church; perhaps I should propose this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://becomingcreation.org/2009/05/epistles-by-peter-and-paul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
